graphic for Judges Inquiry Good vs Great vs Excellent Front Handspring Pike Half Vaults

Judge’s Inquiry: Good vs. Great vs. Excellent Front Handspring Pike Half Vaults

With the immense popularity of Yurchenko-style vault entries, a good front-entry vault used to be relatively rare. However, we are seeing more and more of these powerful vaults, as they offer the advantage of starting from a 10.0 (unlike the Yurchenko full) and a non-blind landing (unlike the Yurchenko one and a half). As of week six, four out of the top 10 vaulters in the NCAA perform this vault, adding to its reputation as a consistent, reliable skill that can score well when performed correctly. However, straight legs and a stuck landing isn’t enough to score a 9.9-plus. What separates the good from the excellent vaults in this category? 

In the next section, I’ll break down the four phases of vault that judges evaluate to come up with the score: pre-flight, support, flight, and landing. In each of these phases, I’ve described what the judges look for, as well as common areas for deductions.

Pre-Flight

The Ideal: The athlete should maintain a straight or slightly open body position with their legs together. Common deductions include leg separation (up to 0.2), hip angle (up to 0.3), and excessive arch (up to 0.2).

Good Example

0.05 to 0.1 hip angle

Great Example

0 to 0.05 hip angle

Excellent Example

No deduction on body position

Support Phase

The Ideal: The head and shoulders should be in alignment, with straight arms and a straight or slightly open body position. The powerful block should be audible to the judges or should visually move the table, with the athlete completing the block at vertical. There should be a clear change of direction from forward momentum to upward momentum following the block. Common deductions include shoulder angle (up to 0.2), excessive arch (up to 0.2), and bent arms (up to 0.5).   

Good Example 

0.1 to 0.15 excessive arch

0.1 to 0.15 shoulder angle

Great Example

0.05 to 0.1 shoulder angle

Excellent Example

No deduction

Flight Phase

The ideal: The athlete should sit up into a clean pike position before opening their body to complete the half twist and prepare for a safe landing. Once the body starts to open, it should be maintained through the landing. There should be a good balance between both height and distance. Common deductions include bent legs (up to 0.3), insufficient extension before landing (up to 0.3), distance (up to 0.3), height (up to 0.5), and dynamics (up to 0.3). Since the flight phase of this vault is rather complicated, I’ve further broken it down into three sub-phases: the pike, the open, and the landing preparation.

The Pike

Good Example

Meets minimum of 90-degree pike position, no deduction

0.05 height

Great Example

Beautiful pike position

No height deduction

Excellent Example

Meets minimum of 90-degree pike position, no deduction

Exceptional height and dynamics 

The Open

Good Example

0.05 to 0.1 distance

0.05 leg form

Great Example

0 to 0.05 distance

Excellent Example

Exemplary height, distance, and dynamics

The Landing Preparation

Good Example

0.15-0.2 insufficient extension before landing

Great Example

0.05 to 0.1 insufficient extension before landing

Excellent Example

Good extension and landing preparation, no deduction

Landing

The ideal: Gymnasts should land with their shoulders in line with or behind their knees, with their knees slightly in front of or in line with their toes. The knees can be bent up to 90 degrees without deduction. The feet should not be staggered or further than hip-width apart and should easily slide together on extension following a controlled landing. Common deductions include steps or foot adjustments (0.05 to 0.2 each, max deduction 0.4), posture on landing (up to 0.2), arm swings to maintain balance (up to 0.1), direction (up to 0.3), and squat on landing (up to 0.3). 

Good Example

0.1 body posture

Great Example

0.05 body posture

Excellent Example

No deduction

READ THIS NEXT: Breaking Down January’s Perfect 10s


Article by Rhiannon Franck

Rhiannon Franck is a former national-rated NAWGJ women’s gymnastics judge with over 15 years of USAG judging experience and nine seasons judging NCAA gymnastics. Outside of gymnastics, Franck works at a university as a nursing professor and loves to travel. You can follow her on Instagram and Twitter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.